There Are No Perfect Answers, We Choose The Best Available
There's a famous Winston Churchill quote about government. He said "democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried."
And it's correct. Democracy is a terrible way to run a country. For one thing, all the wrong people keep getting elected. People will tell you that there are lots of things wrong with democracy. It has obvious flaws - politicians do things to make sure they get re-elected, even when they aren't in the longer-term interests of the country. And it's a long hard, slow process to get things changed, even when it's urgently needed. Politicians say one thing in public and do something else when passing laws. And it's very unstable - every few years the experienced ruling group gets chucked out and another lot comes to power and has to learn how to run the place.
Societies have tried lots of other ways to govern themselves. Tried absolute monarchies, where the king inherits the job from dad, and does whatever he likes until the day he dies. Anyone criticizes him, he cuts their head off. Tried feudalism, where barons run their own little countries, and actually own the workers. Tried giving churches power, but every time they did, they found that the religious leaders kept changing the rules to look after themselves. Tried egalitarian communes, where everybody was equal and everything was shared, but they almost always fell apart, usually over the sharing of women, or work.
So it comes back to what Churchill said - "democracy is the worst form of government except all the others "
The same thing applies to most of science. When someone gets cancer, and the doctor recommends chemotherapy, you know it's far from perfect - your hair will fall out, and you get very sick, because basically you're poisoning your body. Or if your heart fails completely, the only option is a transplant, even though you know you will have to take drugs for the rest of your life to stop your body rejecting it. There are other options - you can try to pray the cancer away, which 200 years ago was all you could do. Or you could try one of the many 'alternative medicine' cures that various characters promote.
Most people choose the science, simply because the evidence shows that it gives you the best chance. Some people will try to talk you into an alternative cure by listing off all the drawbacks, but most recognize that scientific medicine has a far higher success rate. Most people choose the option supported by evidence, rather than ones which only have a few anecdotes to back them up.
Exactly the same thing applies to Evolution. Creationists try to persuade by trotting out their magic list of things they don't like about Evo. They want you to ignore the huge volume of research that supports it. As have said before, the creationists are like little kids with a colouring book with a hundred pages of cartoons like Jesus riding a dinosaur. But they are oblivious to the fact that they are playing on the floor of a huge library filled with millions of books, research papers and evidence for Evo.
The problem with all the 'alternative medicine' explanations is the total lack of evidence. Evo is accepted as the best available explanation because it fits with everything else we know. The various alternative ideas are all equally bad - none of them are backed up by facts. Lots of people who want them to be true, but when you ask them for proof, it all boils down to "I really don't want Evolution to be right."
You can 'believe' whatever you like in the privacy of your own home. You can even be dishonest and run round 'lying for Jesus' to try to talk people into thinking Evo is wrong. Or "There's no point in studying this because God did it and he's mysterious, so we're never going to understand it."
In the real world, Evo is important. It is the foundation of our understanding of how our bodies work. It's even more so as we work through the Human Genome Project and unravel the ways genes work.
It's your choice how you deal with this. You can stick your head in the sand and try to ignore it. Or, you can do what most Christians have done - accept that it's probably correct, and find a way of accommodating it into your faith. Most Christians are secure enough in their belief that it isn't threatened by new knowledge. It's the great strength of human beings - we are flexible. We are capable of changing our minds when evidence shows us we're wrong.