All I am saying, is everyone has a right to their opinion without fear of repercussions. Try spewing this crap in a live speech in a mosque, and tell them that they 72 goats/virgins are a fairytale. THEN come to me and say how much your "opinion" matters.
I'm not sure that that followed logically. You are saying that everyone has a right to an opinion without repercussions. Then you illustrate it by pointing out that if you went to a mosque and started insulting your version of their faith, they will get mad at you. As well they should. You are displaying ignorance about Islam and taking their time and place to rant about your opinions. Expressing your opinions can and will have repercussions. Doing so in the wrong time, place, and manner makes you look like a ass.
The time, place and manner for expressing anti-islamic views is not getting up in their holy place to yell your opinion. The time, place and manner for expressing your creationist disdain for science is not in a public school classroom.
It's Not A Valid Argument
Does your right to your opinion oblige me to agree with you? No, that would make the duty impossible to perform. For I too have a right to my opinion, which you must respect. If we disagree, I must change my opinion to yours, and you must change yours to mine. But then we disagree again, and must change our opinions again. And so on forever, never managing to do our impossible duty.
Does your right to your opinion oblige me to listen to you?
No, I haven’t the time. Many people have many opinions on many matters. You cannot walk through the West End of London without hearing some enthusiast declaring his opinions on our Saviour Jesus or on the Zionist conspiracy or some other topic of pressing concern. To listen to them all is impossible and not therefore a duty.
Does your right to your opinion oblige me to let you keep it?
This is closest to what I think most mean when they claim a right to their opinion. They do so at just that point in an argument when they would otherwise be forced to admit error and change their position. This is also the weakest possible interpretation of the right and thus the most likely to pass the test.
Yet, it is still too strong. We have no duty to let others keep their opinions. On the contrary, we often have a duty to try to change them. Take an obvious example. You are about to cross the street with a friend. A car is coming yet your friend still takes a stride into the road. Knowing that she is not suicidal, you infer that she is of the opinion that no cars are coming. Are you obliged to let her keep this opinion?
I say no. You ought to take every reasonable measure to change her opinion, perhaps by drawing her attention to the oncoming car, saying something like "look out, a car is coming". By so doing, you have not violated her rights. Indeed, she will probably thank you.
On matters such as whether or not a car is about to crush them, everyone is interested in believing the truth; they will take the correction of their errors as a favour. The same goes for any other topic. If someone is interested in believing the truth, then he will not take the presentation of contrary evidence and argument as some kind of injury. He will not invoke an imaginary right that protects him against the revision of his opinions.
It is just that on some topics, many people are not really interested in believing the truth. They might prefer it if their opinion turned out to be true — that would be the icing on the cake — but truth is not too important.
Many of my friends, though subscribing to no familiar religion, claim to believe in a 'superior intelligence' or 'something higher than us'. Yet they will also cheerfully admit the absence of even a shred of evidence. Never mind. There is no cost in error, since the claim is so vague that it has no implications for action (unlike the case of the oncoming car). They just like believing it, perhaps because it would be nice if it were true, or because it helps them get along with their religious parents, or for some other reason.
But truth really is not the point, and it is most annoying to be pressed on the matter. And to register this, to make it clear that truth is neither here nor there, they declare: "I am entitled to my opinion." Once you hear these words, you should realise that it is simple rudeness to persist with the matter. You may be interested in whether or not their opinion is true but take the hint, they aren’t.
Jamie Whyte is the author of Bad Thoughts: A Guide to Clear Thinking